It was decided to host an event where projects do not simply talk at their audience – but rather an active day that is fundamentally about the participants and their experiences. We have chosen a workshop format that is driven by the Planet methodology for pattern language development, an approach that has resonance with the narrative inquiry methodology being adopted by the Rhizome project. The Planet approach is straightforward, taking participants through a number of predefined steps from shared cases to seed patterns. The morning session focuses on storytelling in small groups, and uncovering common themes within shared narratives. In the afternoon these common themes – composed of a problem, solution and associated forces – are used to build the patterns – what Christopher Alexander (1977) defined as:

“a problem which occurs over and over again in our environment, and then describes the core of the solution to that problem, in such a way that you can use this solution a million times over, without ever doing it the same way twice”

The key to the success of the workshop is making sure that relevant stories (or cases) are collected in the Planet Xwiki database in advance of the day. To help guide authors, a template is used to organize each narrative – you can view a blogged case here that uses the STARR template:

http://www.margaperez.com/2008/12/im-also-a-starr-tell-me-whom-you-walk-with-and-ill-tell-you-who-you-are/

Further details of the workshop, including cases and patterns developed from other workshops, are available here on the Planet Xwiki site at http://icanhaz.com/planet-digital-identities.

This first event is by invitation only but we will be holding more follow-up workshops. The next is likely to be in late March/early April. So if you are interested in participating then please do contact us.

References
Alexander, C. with S. Ishikawa, M. Silverstein, M. Jacobson, I. Fiksdahl-King, S. Angel (1977) A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press, New York, 1977
See also: http://www.patternlanguage.com/leveltwo/ca.htm

1.    Desk research based on a review of the existing and heterogeneous literature surrounding online identities and their deployment in the spheres of education and research aiming to:

• Unify research in online identities from the technical aspects relating to authentication and data security through to aspects related to the discursive and contextual nature of digital personas;
• Address the lack of critical analysis surrounding the complex technological landscape of major identity players, for example transactional identity services, where the goals and information handling methods do not always match ethical, functional or usability standards;
• Understand how these services operate given different technologies, environment and user needs;
• Address legal and ethical issues through consultation with the TELOS research group at King’s College London.

2.    A collection and discursive analysis of narrative case studies of online identity deployment in education and research aimed at teasing out user needs, user behaviours, opportunities, challenges and trends. This will be based on a storytelling methodology (Kubler Labosky 2002, Andrews et al. 2008) as an approach for capturing meaningful personal stories to provide insights into individual experiences and perceptions of online identity. This will be driven by two key research questions:

a.    How people manage their own understanding of digital identity in online environments (personal, corporate and administrative) and how identity operates within different contexts?
b.    What kinds of [digital] literacies are needed to support and manage online identity development?

A validated template will be used to collect individual narratives from an identified set of actors in the educational field. The stories will be analysed to create themes and then opened to the community for discussion and commentary to discover patterns and similarities and followed by a final round of analysis. This activity will be supported by two workshop sessions. As documents of contextualised practice the stories will be used as a baseline for identifying and building a framework for good practice providing evidence for patterns of activity that are both successful and problematic.

3.    A scenario building (van der Heijden, 2003) exercise will be used to as a basis for road mapping possible futures in the sphere of online identity. This will be organised online and supported by a roundtable workshop with identified stakeholders who will include decision makers, experts and creative thinkers. Exploratory scenarios will be developed (Schwartz 1996, Ringland 2002) with the aim of fostering the exchange of ideas, identification of challenges and the barriers to the deployment of an online identity research agenda, as well as development and implementation roadmaps in the UK.

4.    The outputs from the above activities will be synthesised to form the basis for the conceptual framework leading to a position paper that will address practical, social and political issues that stem from the research. The paper will be validated by a consultation process involving semi-structured interviews and open comment through a consensus building process with the key stakeholders and main players across the landscape of digital identity production.

5.    Development work on an Open Source software solution will run in parallel and be informed by the outputs from the story and scenario research. This phase of the project will be focussed on the enhancement of a plug-in for the Open Source WordPress blogging tool (http://www.wordpress.org) and involve design techniques based on user needs analyses and phased testing of the sotware.