Outlining the methodological approach of the Rhizome project:
1. Desk research based on a review of the existing and heterogeneous literature surrounding online identities and their deployment in the spheres of education and research aiming to:
- Unify research in online identities from the technical aspects relating to authentication and data security through to aspects related to the discursive and contextual nature of digital personas;
- Address the lack of critical analysis surrounding the complex technological landscape of major identity players, for example transactional identity services, where the goals and information handling methods do not always match ethical, functional or usability standards;
- Understand how these services operate given different technologies, environment and user needs;
- Address legal and ethical issues through consultation with the TELOS research group at King’s College London.
2. A collection and discursive analysis of narrative case studies of online identity deployment in education and research aimed at teasing out user needs, user behaviours, opportunities, challenges and trends. This will be based on a storytelling methodology (Kubler Labosky 2002, Andrews et al. 2008) as an approach for capturing meaningful personal stories to provide insights into individual experiences and perceptions of online identity. This will be driven by two key research questions:
a. How people manage their own understanding of digital identity in online environments (personal, corporate and administrative) and how identity operates within different contexts?
b. What kinds of [digital] literacies are needed to support and manage online identity development?
A validated template will be used to collect individual narratives from an identified set of actors in the educational field. The stories will be analysed to create themes and then opened to the community for discussion and commentary to discover patterns and similarities and followed by a final round of analysis. This activity will be supported by two workshop sessions. As documents of contextualised practice the stories will be used as a baseline for identifying and building a framework for good practice providing evidence for patterns of activity that are both successful and problematic.
3. A scenario building (van der Heijden, 2003) exercise will be used to as a basis for road mapping possible futures in the sphere of online identity. This will be organised online and supported by a roundtable workshop with identified stakeholders who will include decision makers, experts and creative thinkers. Exploratory scenarios will be developed (Schwartz 1996, Ringland 2002) with the aim of fostering the exchange of ideas, identification of challenges and the barriers to the deployment of an online identity research agenda, as well as development and implementation roadmaps in the UK.
4. The outputs from the above activities will be synthesised to form the basis for the conceptual framework leading to a position paper that will address practical, social and political issues that stem from the research. The paper will be validated by a consultation process involving semi-structured interviews and open comment through a consensus building process with the key stakeholders and main players across the landscape of digital identity production.
5. Development work on an Open Source software solution will run in parallel and be informed by the outputs from the story and scenario research. This phase of the project will be focussed on the enhancement of a plug-in for the Open Source Wordpress blogging tool (http://www.wordpress.org) and involve design techniques based on user needs analyses and phased testing of the sotware.


Jenny Millea says:
This sounds very interesting and a big issue in a web2.0 world in an education sector that aspires to providing services for lifelong learning.
Like most people my identity is a bit fractured…
http://blogs.educationau.edu.au/jmillea/2008/07/22/i-facebook-therefore-i-am-continuous-partial-commitment/
October 27th, 2008 at 12:19 am
Geoff Cain says:
Cool! You can begin addressing “the lack of critical analysis” by crediting Dave Cormier with the rhizome concept. http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/archives/003572.html
October 28th, 2008 at 5:19 am
Margarita Pérez-García says:
Dear Geoff, we do not need to credit Dave Cormier work on Rhizomatic education here. The two projects are different although we use the same concept of Rhizome.
As I wrote to George, who raises the issue: ‘…The Rhizome project is called Rhizome not because of David, who used, as we use, the well known and not so new concept of rhizome! The main reference we use and publicly acknowledge has another weight: is Deleuze and Guattari’s rhizome we are referring to, in A Thousands Plateaus.
October 28th, 2008 at 11:16 pm